Sea Duck Joint Venture Logo

NAWMP Logo
North American Waterfowl
Management Plan


What's a Joint Venture?

SDJV Contacts

Funding Opportunities

Meet the Sea Ducks

Sea Duck Information Series

Satellite Telemetry Studies

Atlantic Migration Study

Endangered and Threatened Sea Ducks

SDJV- Endorsed Studies

Sea Duck Conferences
4th International Sea Duck Conference Logo
2011 Conference

Abstracts previous conferences

Related Resources
  Wetlands International:
    Sea Duck Specialist Group
    Threatened Waterfowl Specialist

  How We Catch Sea Ducks

The Sea Duck Joint Venture

Recommendations for Monitoring Distribution,
Abundance, and Trends of North American Sea Ducks

The Sea Duck Monitoring Working Group, an ad hoc group formed under the auspices of the Sea Duck Joint Venture (SDJV), met March 9-11, 2005, at Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland to develop recommendations for monitoring sea duck populations in North America. The most current draft report is now available (see below)

The Sea Duck Monitoring Working Group was formed at the request of the SDJV Management Board to identify and prioritize monitoring needs for North American sea ducks. The working group met in March 2005 and produced a list of high, medium, and low priority monitoring needs. The process involved four steps: 1) identify populations or stocks that are appropriate as management units; 2) determine relative conservation priorities among stocks; 3) identify appropriate monitoring tasks for those stocks; and 4) prioritize among surveys or tasks. In addition, the working group identified activities that should be accomplished to design, evaluate the feasibility, or enable interpretation of specific surveys. A prioritized list of monitoring needs is presented to help guide decisions about how to allocate current and future funds. The working group also recognized that nearly every sea duck species is currently inadequately monitored, and that opportunities to monitor populations or conduct sea duck surveys should be encouraged and pursued when appropriate and cost effective. Further prioritization will undoubtedly be needed as new information becomes available and alternative survey techniques are tested.

Download Monitoring Report (pdf)